Water on the moon boiled away in massive quantities in a cataclysmic evaporation event during the moon's
birth, bolstering the theory that a Mars-sized body collided with the
Earth to form its only natural satellite, scientists say.
Researchers examined rocks collected by astronauts during NASA's Apollo
lunar landing missions, as well as a meteorite that originated on the moon
to make the find. They looked for traces of zinc, and found the ratios
of heavy to light isotopes are greater than on Earth, which suggests the
moon went through an intense evaporation event early in its formation.
The study is more evidence for the theory that the moon formed from a colossal impact, researchers said.
Early in the moon's formation,
the surface was hot enough to vaporize zinc – and a giant impact is one
of the few things that would generate that much heat. Another
prediction of the theory is that heavier isotopes would be more common,
because they would condense at a higher temperature.
"What we found is that the depletion [of lighter isotopes] of Zinc is
probably due to evaporation," said study co-author Frédéric Moynier,
assistant professor of Earth and planetary sciences at the Washington
University in St. Louis. [How the Moon Formed (Video)]
Zinc on the moon
Moynier, study lead author Randal Paniello and James Day of the Scripps
Institution of Oceanography, found that the ratio of zinc-66 to zinc-64
in moon rocks
is about three to four times greater than either Earth or Mars. On the
Earth and Mars respectively, it is 0.25 to 0.27 parts per thousand. On
the moon, it was a difference of 1.3 to 1.4 parts per thousand.
Almost all the samples collected from the moon had similar ratios of
heavier to light isotopes, even though they came from very different
places all over the moon. (One sample came from a meteorite that
originated there).
The team also measured the effect in tektites, which are pebble-sized
rocks formed by meteor impacts. They found the same thing: The tektites
were also depleted in zinc-64 relative to ordinary Earth rocks.
The high temperatures imply the water vaporized. That would also point
to a depletion of other volatiles – elements such as hydrogen, chlorine,
sulfur, which vaporize at relatively low temperatures.
Searching for moon water
However, several studies show water present in some lunar rocks.Recent missions like NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite revealed evidence of moon water in 2009. India's Chandrayaan-1 found hydroxyl, an oxygen-hydrogen compound that makes water when bonded to another hydrogen atom.
How much water and other volatiles the moon has is a key question for
plans of future lunar exploration by astronauts. Advocates of a "wet
moon" say that the lunar mantle may have big stores of those chemicals.
But other scientists think the volatiles are mostly in the top layers of
lunar soil, brought in by impacts and generally dating from after the
moon's formation.
"[The results] show that all this water they found on the face of the moon is secondary water," Moynier said.
Water and volatiles are probably from impacts and the solar wind,
Moynier said. The studies showing volatiles in the volcanic glass might
be showing local areas that are enriched, relative to the rest of the
moon, he added.Denton Ebel, curator of meteorites at the American Museum of Natural History, noted that there is evidence of seismic activity on the moon and evidence of hydrogen-bearing rocks at the moon's interior. Ebel was not involved it he study.
There is also a heat source at the center of the moon. That would point to some volatiles and water being there. But the new research seems to show a moon-spanning mine of water and other volatiles is less likely.
"The dry moon is dead, but the wet moon is not alive," he said.
Ebel noted that the isotope study confirms a prediction of the impact theory
of the moon's formation. There are still a lot of questions, though.
For example, the moon's composition is broadly similar to the Earth's
mantle – as the impact theory predicts. But the Earth's mantle is
depleted in potassium, and the moon's should look the same. It doesn't.
The study also shows how important it is to get samples, Ebel said.
Without the Apollo moon rocks and lunar meteorites, gathered mostly
from Antarctica, it would be harder to test the impact theory at all,
since the evidence comes from direct chemical analysis.
The research is detailed in the Oct. 18 edition of the journal Nature. LINK
Posts
